35. M'atch the Knowledge Management Model (List-I) with its respective approach (List-II): List I (KM Model) List II (Approach)
(A) Von Krogh and Roos (i) Sense-Making
(B) WIIG (ii) Synchronize
(C) Nonaka and Takeuchi (iii) Organizational Epistemology
(D) Choo (iv) Socialization
Ans.: (A)-(iii), (B)-(ii), (C)-(iv), (D)-(i)
The Von Krogh and Roos Model of Organizational Epistemology (1995) is the first model that clearly distinguishes between individual knowledge and social knowledge following an epistemological point of view regarding knowledge management.
Yon Krogh and Roos: Their model emphasizes Organizational Epistemology, focusing on how knowledge is created, shared, and utilized
within an organization, and the assumptions behind those processes.
Karl Wiig KM model (1993) highlights the following principle in order for kn . ledge to be useful and valuable, it must be organized. Knowledge should be or alfized a ffeFently
depending on what the knowledge will be used for. Some useful dimensi0ns i th Wi1gs KM model are: completeness, connectedness, congruency, and perspective a d t1 po e. T is model utilizes a Synchronize approach, often involving semantic netwoik-s t c t gonze and link knowledge for efficient retrieval and decision-making.
The Choo Sense-Making KM Model (1998) stresses sense making, knowledge creation and decision making. Choo (1998) asserts that the "knowjN.g organizations" are those which use information strategically in the context of three arenas, namely, (a) sense making, (b) knowledge creation and (c) decision maki g. These thre ighly interconnected processes play a strategic role as to the unfoldment O' 1h 0 ganiza i- n's knowledge vision, it's potential to knowledge creation and its comm1 e t into tak'mg knowledge creation to the utmost consequences
No comments:
Post a Comment